Reviewer Guidelines: Research Notes

Analytics operates at the intersection of such fields as writing studies, educational measurement, massive data analysis, digital learning ecologies, and ethical philosophy. The journal is devoted to programs of research providing evidence of fair, reliable, and valid analytics. 

We have provided detailed Author Guidelines for Research Notes. Based on those guidelines, the categories below ask reviewers to make a series of analytic judgements on each section of the manuscript. After providing scores, reviewers are then asked to provide notes in which they justify and explain their assessment of the given section of the manuscript.

Publishing Recommendation

Please select only one recommendation:

Publish
as is

Publish with minor changes

 

Revise and resubmit

Reject

 

Please briefly explain your decision:

 

Comment Category 1: Abstract

The abstract (between 150 and 200 words) presents a comprehensive overview of the research note.

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Structured Abstract:

Comment Category 2: Aim

The aim section positions the research note and explains its purpose and significance. 

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Aim:

 

Comment Category 3: Problem Formation

The problem formation section identifies and explains the gap that the note will discuss. 

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Problem Formation:

Comment Category 4: Methods and/or Discussion

The discussion section describes the methods used or information collected related to the problem. 

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Information Collection:

 

Comment Category 5: Conclusions

The conclusion section provides justification that information collection process has identified the problem discussed in the note, as well as any related problems also in need of additional research. All attendant qualifications to claims made should also be included.

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Conclusions:

Comment Category 6: Directions for Further Action

Authors should conclude the note with directions for further action intended to address the identified problem. 

Very Strongly Agree

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Very Strongly Disagree

6

5

4

3

2

1

Notes on Directions for Further Research:

 

Reviewer Notes

Please provide any additional integrative notes on the manuscript related to your publishing recommendation.