|
The mbu discussion has bounced around a lot in its six-year existence, but the real problem has only surfaced once or twice. The real problem with computer-based writing instruction has been embedded in the nature of the teachers themselves. What are they, these people who teach literature/writing? Why do they do it? Are they writers themselves? Are they people who actually spend hours a week reading the great 'stuff' they shove down students' throats? Are they as intellectually acute in their own lives as the models they force upon their students? Do they think about things in the way that they tell students are proper? Do they do what they tell their students that THEY should do? --------- No. I've had it with prescriptivist bullshit teachers who memorize a bunch of stuff over twenty years and then pound their own students for not having a clue about ridiculous stuff that any reasonable human being wouldn't even CONSIDER in any but coercive circumstances. 90% of the writing teachers in America are teaching 'rules' that they themselves have never, ever applied, MAINLY because they have never written a thing for publication. They don't know what writing IS because they have never written. They have only transferred down the line the 'rules' that they have been taught, ad infinitum. I was taught these rules, and now I teach these rules. [Lord this happens so much in life!]
What do I do to keep alive my own feelings about writing when all I hear is this stuff about priming people for some correctness machine down the line (business? graduate school?) I write. Like now. Like it or not, this message is my way of handling my feelings about writing. But I have the courage of my convictions, stupid as they may be. Our students will never have courage in their writing if we don't honest-to-god read what they write, and think about what they write instead of nail them off the bat for WHAT they write. Real life, MBU. |
Subsequent reponses to this snapshot:
Contributions will be added to the Rhetnet web and will be linked to this page.
Visits to his end of cyberspace since 21 Feb 96: 
Writing is a human emotion process,
not a rule process. What happens to writing teachers when they, after a number
of years, start restricting writing instruction to all these rules instead
of what writing really is? Do they become so separated from the actual act
of writing itself that they
start thinking that writing is some great Tic-Tac-Toe board of activity
instead of something that grabs people by their gut and heart?