Maybe Czicsentimihalyi's (sp? don't make me write that again!) idea of the
flow experience is better than "fun." Flow, according to Czich, is
pleasurable, involving, embodied, even maybe fun, but it's pleasures issue
from the challenging aspects of the activity, and the learning is really
not tedious like skill and drill practices because it occurs (ideally) with
the doing or at least in simulation, AKA active learning.
We shouldn't try to fit narratives of writing processes into a
predetermined metaphor or concept, but we can look through them to see what
they bring forward.
>on the subject of jazz improvisation:
>i am no musician, but i am a young fan of jazz trying to learn some of the
>nuances of its improvisational heritage (as well as its slippage into
>composition). MER very adeptly points out, though, based on his own
>experience as a jazz guitarist, that the process of formal jazz learning is
>not just "fun" but has its own elements of tedium.
>i followed MER around after his presentation for a while in logan, and as he
>spoke about the process of learning jazz "standards" it was clear that one
>must reach a certain level of expertise before one was encouraged to
>improvise. transcribing others' improvisations, endless hours getting
>performances "right," *plus* learning immitations, then moving on to
>what i find so interesting in this model is the devotion individual
>musicians have for the repetitious skill-based practice of scale playing and
>transcription of performances. seems to be skills and drills involved in
>jazz too. and i wonder if this model works as well after careful
>consideration for writing -- seems more like a creative writing model, where
>genius is studies, deconstructed, then reconstructed in order to produce
>i'm concerned we take too easily an image of improvisation without
>understanding the layers of process and hard work that are built into what
>an audience only sees as a "great improvisation." there are years of work
>behind that performance; do we mystify the process if we don't share the
>story of the long term struggle?
>perhaps MER and our other jazz-educated colleagues will share more on this
>topic. i thought, at one point, that i understood the jazz/composition
>metaphor fairly well, but i am no longer so sure.
>mike, listening to another version of 'cherokee'
>At 09:43 AM 7/25/96 -0600, Albert Rouzie wrote:
>> Mer's jazz image gives us a
>>play/improvisation metaphor suitable to the list's improvised mesh and it
>>raises other terms, like bricolage, with the similar sense of improvisatory
>>flair for constructing emanings out of whatever materials are at hand or
>>eye. I think we need to explore the idea of pleasure in writing,
University of Texas at Austin
Soon to be at: Ohio University, Dept of English, Athens, OH. 45701
Home: 386 Rolling Hills Drive, Athens, OH 45701
(614) 592-6059 (effective 8/12)
"O for a muse of fire,
that would ascend the brightest heaven of Invention...."