Anyone remember Lex Runciman's College English essay "Fun?"? His point
that we seldom refer to our pleasure in the processes of writing and
thinking could inform whatever form this project takes. I worry less about
reification of the narratives as prescription (which Nick points out can be
avoided through follow-up, inclusion of other voices, and a hypertextual
structure) than that we may end up representing the whole enterprise in the
dreary terms Runciman was protesting. Mer's jazz image gives us a
play/improvisation metaphor suitable to the list's improvised mesh and it
raises other terms, like bricolage, with the similar sense of improvisatory
flair for constructing emanings out of whatever materials are at hand or
eye. I think we need to explore the idea of pleasure in writing,
recognizing, of course, that some folks view it as just hard work, but also
trying to prevent that from becoming the image one carries away from the
site.
-Albert
*************
Albert Rouzie
University of Texas at Austin
e-mail: rouzie@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu
http://www.cwrl.utexas.edu/~rouzie/rouziepage.html
*******************
Soon to be at: Ohio University, Dept of English, Athens, OH. 45701
(614) 593-2838
Home: 386 Rolling Hills Drive, Athens, OH 45701
(614) 592-6059 (effective 8/12)
"O for a muse of fire,
that would ascend the brightest heaven of Invention...."
Da Bard