>How about this? Can we keep the idea of canon but strip it of its
>petrifying institutional power? Can we open the possibility of millions of
>canons, of canons that are fundamentally unstable, that are constructed
>idiosyncratically and shift continually? Canons that are only snapshots of
>knowledge, products of the moment but eternal processes of the intellect?
Isn't this what there is right now, protests to the contrary
-- Chris Lott email@example.com "But I held on like death, Such waltzing was not easy."