On Thu, 27 Jun 1996, Beth W. Baldwin, PhD wrote:
> I think that if we want our work in electronic publication to be taken
> seriously by search committees and in tenure decisions, the most
> significant contribution we can make lies in the simple act of including
> electronic publications in the list of publications you include on your
> vita. Don't have a category for "traditional publications" and one for
> "electronic publications," and don't chicken out altogether and leave off
> the electronic publications.
>
> I'm willing to bet that many of us *do* include our electronic
> publications, given the nature of this list. But I often sit in on
> conversations with colleagues in which they constantly question whether or
> not e-publications should be included. How the inclusion of those
> publications will be interpreted by various committees.
>
> I say that if you regard your work seriously, that demonstrate that by
> including it on your CV, thus implying that others should take it
> seriously as well.
>
> The more these works appear on CVs that cross committee desks, the more
> inclined they will be to take them seriously. (This last sentence is just
> my theory, of course).
>
> Beth
>
> ********************************************
> Beth Baldwin, Ph.D. *
> University of North Carolina at Greensboro *
> Greensboro, NC 27412-5001 *
> 910-334-5140 *
> ********************************************
>