> These folks don't present pomo theory but enact a complex dialogic world
> that *behaves post modernly* when looked at from my perspective.
> And I like Anthony's suggestion that we look outside lit-theory.
I'm a-okay with both of the above. If you're working within and
from (spectator as well as participant) a complex enactment, you are
also outside of lit-theory and the need to apply a label like