Re: unusual language

Tue, 8 Oct 1996 11:03:33 -0500

Nick et al., this is an excellent proposal. It would be not only
interesting to listen to what the editors have to say but also, more so,
what the presumptions might be behind the questions. Questions can get asked
very differently when the addressee is present.


On Tue, 8 Oct 1996, Nick Carbone wrote:

> It might help, if we continue this, to invite the editors who issued the
> call onto the list. Not to lecture them or arraign them, but to see what
> they think about the whole issue and to give them a chance to describe
> what they have in mind for the journal, who its audience is, and why they
> prefer an approach grounded in the language of pomo theory (if that's what
> it is--I lose track these days).