On Tue, 8 Oct 1996, Nick Carbone wrote:
> It might help, if we continue this, to invite the editors who issued the
> call onto the list. Not to lecture them or arraign them, but to see what
> they think about the whole issue and to give them a chance to describe
> what they have in mind for the journal, who its audience is, and why they
> prefer an approach grounded in the language of pomo theory (if that's what
> it is--I lose track these days).