Home | Statement | Drafts | History | Resources |
CCCC 1997: Outcomes Forum (Session L.17)Session Results: Kathleen Blake Yancey (Overview)Outcomes: An Impressionistic OverviewI. Some Reporting of Points Made in Different Groups *writing is only part of what we do: reading needs to be accounted for as well *students need to become comfortable with writing *students need to work with sources *it is very difficult to get faculty consensus on first-year composition *it isn't enough to use phrases like "the process approach to writing": we have to define them *outcomes could be used to help faculty in other disciplines understand what we do, and to provide the vocabulary of the course *how/do grades fit with outcomes? *students expect writing to be efficient, so an outcome will need to deal with that *in the outcomes, writing should be conceptualized as an intellectual activity, as the chance to pursue scholarship and truth II. Some Interpretations/Implications of Outcomes *outcomes can be used to define the course as much as to define what we expect from students *the need to anticipate what students bring with them when they walk in the door and build on that: outcomes are situated, in other ways, in multiple contexts *given outcomes, who will teach writing? *how can we educate faculty? *how can we prevent legislatures from writing outcomes that are not applicable to all institutions? *outcomes could provide a starting place to inquire into what it is that we do with our students and how well we do it Return to Leaders menu; Return to Results menu |
Site
maintained by comppile@gmail.com Pages originally compiled and maintained by Keith Rhodes Last updated February 14, 2010 |