From: Dickie Selfe
[rselfe@clemson.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 2:53 PM
To: cwonline@nwe.ufl.edu
Subject: Re: Early Implementors

Charlie Moran wrote:

   I've been watching the humanities, the home of critique, become
   lessimportant over the past 40 years, and in particular the last 
   15-20 years; and other aspects of the academy that might be connected 
   to *design* become more important---urban planning, landscape 
   architecture, schools of management, some aspects of engineering. 
   And our Chancellor seems to spend his entire day attempting to engage 
   us in "strategic planning." We were told by an alum/dot-com CEO that 
   in today's work world there's no value to reflection, at all.

Could this be because they use different language and processes to 
accomplish their version of reflection: rapid prototyping, usability 
testing, user-centered design, participatory design, focus groups, . 
. . ? If he thinks there is no value in paying attention to what you 
are doing, then I don't think much of that company's long-term 
prospects.

   Now "design" is not exactly *implementation," but I know that our 
   various tech programs and labs have been carefully designed and then
   implemented, so I'd say that we're doing what Kress says we should
   do---creating programs from available materials, moving quickly into 
   implementation. I know that if I'd taken the 'bean-counter' approach 
   when we first brought technology in, we'd still be doing cost-benefit 
   analyses!

No reason not to do both all the time is there? We publish our budget 
every year for students to see and analyze. We make all our new STC 
majors rethink that budget as a way of learning how to use Excel in 
our intro. technology class. Those analyses help us reimagine where 
we are and where we are going. It's also a hell of a good 
bean-counter education for our students. I'm not sure I agree with 
Gunther if he imagines these as entirely independent. Can you point 
me at a Kress volume that deals with this?

   Off to teach my first-year writing class. I asked them to do 
   some cost-benefit thinking about our lab---that if we could take 
   lab-money and spend it on TA's we could reduce class size across 
   the program by 1.4 students---and they all said that we should 
   get more computers, fire some teachers, and increase class size!

Yep, I get stuff like this too. I'm sure you do the same thing I do: 
use it as an opportunity to make a case for alternative approaches 
????

Dickie Selfe

Previous | Next