
Content Area:
Communication Across the Curriculum
Electronic Communication Across the Curriculum
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Discipline:
Welcome to the WAC Clearinghouse Theses and Dissertations Page. The theses are displayed below. If you'd like us to add a new thesis or dissertation to our list, please contact Kevin Eric De Pew.
This dissertation examined the effects on learner attitude and achievement of using a cognitive apprenticeship Approach to teach college-level algebra. College Algebra was chosen because similar studies such as Treisman's Workshop model have focused on Calculus rather than students who are considered by many institutions 'remedial' learners. The cognitive apprenticeship Approach included emphasis on a language-intensive classroom in which learners were encouraged to think, talk, write, and reflect on their learning of mathematical concepts. It incorporated inquiry teaching (focusing on interactive questioning of learners) and the use of writing Across the curriculum strategies. The study reviewed the literature with regard to the effect of the 'traditional' Approach to mathematics instruction, especially on minorities and women, and identified alternative approaches including the one selected. Results of the study indicated no significant differences in either attitude or achievement; however, some aspects of the data suggested that the experimental group may have started at a lower point but were comparable in achievement by the end of the study. The study also examined the results of interviews with participants as an assessment of learner attitudes. Included are common themes of the interviews as they related to the components of Collin's cognitive apprenticeship model. Finally, the study included, as a special case, students enrolled in a pre-college level algebra course and offered some observations about the benefits of the method for this group.
This was an investigation to determine if significant differences exist in the instruction of editing skills for fifth grade students in schools in Pennsylvania whose school scores in editing skills as measured by the Educational Quality Assessment (EQA) are above or below their predicted band. The problem focused specifically on the question: Is there a relationship between good writing process instruction and good editing skills knowledge? EQA data was used to identify schools that had scored consistently above their predicted band in writing skills or below their predicted band in writing skills. Schools were then assigned as matched pairs according to their skill performance and demographics. To assure that demographically similar schools were matched, the scores for four variables were obtained from EQA data. The four variables were community type, parent occupation, parent education, and grade enrollment. A total of eighty schools, or forty matched pairs were used for the study. A survey that had been developed by the researcher and that was based on factors which critics in the area of writing considered to be important in the development of good writing skills was mailed to the schools identified for the study. Teachers in grades one through five in those schools were asked to complete the survey. After the surveys had been returned to the researcher, a school score for each question on the survey was computed providing a mean for each question for each school. These school scores were used to compare the schools in the above-band group with the schools in the below-band group. Since the matched pairs were of schools that were alike demographically but had scored differently on the EQA, t tests were used to compare the means computed from the survey questions. Variables used for analysis were in-service training in the writing process, conferencing, revision, audience awareness, writing Across the curriculum, teacher writing, student choice of topic, integration of reading with writing, and team writing. Analysis of the data showed that there was no significant relationship between writing process techniques and good editing skills scores.
Theses and dissertation abstracts and citation information are provided courtesy of UMI Company, except as noted in abstracts. Copyright © for UMI materials 1998-2009 UMI Company, A Bell & Howell Company. All rights reserved. To order a dissertation or thesis, visit http://wwwlib.umi.com/dxweb/gateway.
Copyright © 1997-2009 Colorado State University and/or this site's authors, developers, and contributors. Some material displayed on this site is used with permission.